|
Post by Thriller on Dec 23, 2017 9:39:40 GMT
Nobody knows. This is speculation but, I wouldn't be surprised if it was a cumulation of things and then Wade's BS just made things worse. Yes, perhaps.
I remember some fans even speculating about how Wade set the whole thing up to try and force Jordan Chandler to be testify under oath and expose his lies and ultimately exonerate MJ. I don't know where the hell they got that crazy-ass theory from though.... thin air, I guess. lol
Yes, definitely thin air. Also a combination of not wanting to admit Wade is a scumbag and an ignorance in regard to getting somebody to testify. Jordan can't be forced to testify. Also, even when an FBI agent and a member of law enforcement visited him regarding testifying in a criminal trial he refused. ![](https://vindicatemj.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/jordan-chandler-has-done-his-part.jpg) Therefore, he was never going to participate in a trial involving Wade. Add to that, even if he were to testify, he could have easily answered every question with 'I don't know' or 'I can't remember' a la Jason Francia in 2005. Also, Wade would be lying under oath and then, I'm assuming those fans figured he'd admit at a trial it was all part of a scheme to expose Jordan?, in which case, if one entertains the ridiculous theory, Wade would end up in trouble himself for lying under oath.
|
|
|
Post by suzie on Dec 25, 2017 14:41:34 GMT
Yes, perhaps.
I remember some fans even speculating about how Wade set the whole thing up to try and force Jordan Chandler to be testify under oath and expose his lies and ultimately exonerate MJ. I don't know where the hell they got that crazy-ass theory from though.... thin air, I guess. lol
Yes, definitely thin air. Also a combination of not wanting to admit Wade is a scumbag and an ignorance in regard to getting somebody to testify. Jordan can't be forced to testify. Also, even when an FBI agent and a member of law enforcement visited him regarding testifying in a criminal trial he refused. ![](https://vindicatemj.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/jordan-chandler-has-done-his-part.jpg) Therefore, he was never going to participate in a trial involving Wade. Add to that, even if he were to testify, he could have easily answered every question with 'I don't know' or 'I can't remember' a la Jason Francia in 2005. Also, Wade would be lying under oath and then, I'm assuming those fans figured he'd admit at a trial it was all part of a scheme to expose Jordan?, in which case, if one entertains the ridiculous theory, Wade would end up in trouble himself for lying under oath. Yea it's very telling that he won't testify. How can he say he done his part when he never testified in the first case? No you didn't do anything which is why there are still cases years later
|
|
ChrisC
Wondering Who
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png)
Posts: 200
|
Post by ChrisC on Jan 1, 2018 19:12:15 GMT
What did Paris say?
|
|
|
Post by Thriller on Jan 2, 2018 0:05:43 GMT
Part of the tweet was 'going after a dead man for a quick buck'. I don't recall the rest as it has now been deleted.
|
|
|
Post by jaywonder on Jan 2, 2018 1:47:55 GMT
people think going after a dead man for a quick buck is an easy and good idea but homie if youโre tryna tarnish the rep of a pure angel what makes you think you wonโt get ****ed up somehow along the way โ Paris-Michael K. J. (@parisjackson)
|
|