|
Post by kremlinshadow on Feb 6, 2019 17:09:57 GMT
I clicked on the link because I wasn't sure what it was and wanted to find out. If that makes you take some moral highground or makes you think you're somehow better than me I don't really know what I'm supposed to say to you. While we are at it I just saw another one one Twitter that the Sun now writes MJ was "grooming" Blanket. Maybe we want to check that one out too. Surely they have some interesting and valuable info. Surely this is libellous? Considering he and the nephew's are still alive, someone has hopefully forwarded this to Taj.
|
|
|
Post by Thriller on Feb 6, 2019 17:23:27 GMT
* That seven years is contradicted in this documentary. With Wade claiming they 'reconnected' and MJ tried to abuse him one last time, yet in his complaint the abuse was regular between the age of 7 and 14. Is this what Wade has claimed on camera in the documentary? If so, it is absolutely disgusting and I'm appalled this is being aired. it is such a serious and lurid claim, surely the Estate can do something to stop this being aired? Yes. --- Sounds like the Blanket story is a rehash of the 2016 story Radar ran where they said MJ was grooming Blanket and showed 'sexy photos' (Radar's words) of 3T to boys.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Feb 6, 2019 17:28:46 GMT
How absolutely vile and psychopathic you have to be to drag a child into this!
|
|
|
Post by pg13 on Feb 6, 2019 17:35:40 GMT
Is this what Wade has claimed on camera in the documentary? If so, it is absolutely disgusting and I'm appalled this is being aired. it is such a serious and lurid claim, surely the Estate can do something to stop this being aired? Yes. --- Sounds like the Blanket story is a rehash of the 2016 story Radar ran where they said MJ was grooming Blanket and showed 'sexy photos' (Radar's words) of 3T to boys. That's exactly what it is - a rehash. The article talks about how the police (SBPD) interviewed an unidentified nephew of Michael Jackson who allegedly told them about Michael and boys, including Blanket. Of course, zero supporting evidence is provided for it. It also mentions the photoshoot with MJ and 3T. So, nothing new in it.
|
|
|
Post by Snow White on Feb 6, 2019 17:47:18 GMT
It wouldn't surprise me if Reed was a paedophile himself but his depravity and high horse attitude towards MJ pisses me off
|
|
|
Post by Russg on Feb 6, 2019 19:34:32 GMT
As some of you know, I've been having some doubts lately. I took your advice and have stopped reading the tabloid articles and am just trying to read up a bit more about the actual facts of the past cases.
The most recent thing that I found troubling though, was in a recent interview with Corey Feldman where he said that MJ showed him a graphic picture book depicting human genitalia as a child. I don't see why Corey would make this up, as Corey has always defended MJ and still does to this day, so I have no reason to suspect that he's lying. For those who haven't read it, Corey said that it struck him as strange looking back in retrospect that MJ as a 35yr old man would share such a thing with a child. I don't believe Corey was trying to insinuate that MJ was guilty, he was merely pointing out something that he couldn't explain.
I hate hearing stuff like that, because it makes you question MJs motives.
|
|
|
Post by MattyJam on Feb 6, 2019 19:50:23 GMT
As some of you know, I've been having some doubts lately. I took your advice and have stopped reading the tabloid articles and am just trying to read up a bit more about the actual facts of the past cases. The most recent thing that I found troubling though, was in a recent interview with Corey Feldman where he said that MJ showed him a graphic picture book depicting human genitalia as a child. I don't see why Corey would make this up, as Corey has always defended MJ and still does to this day, so I have no reason to suspect that he's lying. For those who haven't read it, Corey said that it struck him as strange looking back in retrospect that MJ as a 35yr old man would share such a thing with a child. I don't believe Corey was trying to insinuate that MJ was guilty, he was merely pointing out something that he couldn't explain. I hate hearing stuff like that, because it makes you question MJs motives. Tbh, I've never entirely trusted Corey Feldman. He was a fairweather friend to Michael in life and only had glowing things to say about him when it was socially acceptable to do so, but when the shit hit the fan, he changed his tune. He did exactly this during the 2005 trial. I don't have the quotes to hand, but I do recall him making some remarks back then about how MJ could possibly be guilty, and then having a change of heart after MJ died. With friends who flip-flop like that, who needs enemies? With regards to the book MJ allegedly showed him, it is a bit strange that he never brought this up in the last 20 years or so, until now. It strikes me that he is trying to distance himself a bit from his association with MJ, likely because he doesn't want to jeopardise his own documentary that is in the works about child abuse in Hollywood. Corey has always put himself first and has a history of throwing Michael under the bus in time like this. So I wouldn't trust a word he says.
|
|
|
Post by elusivemoonwalker on Feb 6, 2019 20:01:29 GMT
The book story is years old. He said mj showed him a book about stds and horrible stuff inorder to put him off the things he was getting upto at that time of his life.certainly not a book you would show for any sexual reason. didnt he give that interview to dimond or someone similiar. Of course he let it run for the attention before clarifying it. Personally i dont trust him hes an attention seeker and i wouldnt trust him as far as i could throw him
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Feb 6, 2019 20:04:38 GMT
As some of you know, I've been having some doubts lately. I took your advice and have stopped reading the tabloid articles and am just trying to read up a bit more about the actual facts of the past cases. The most recent thing that I found troubling though, was in a recent interview with Corey Feldman where he said that MJ showed him a graphic picture book depicting human genitalia as a child. I don't see why Corey would make this up, as Corey has always defended MJ and still does to this day, so I have no reason to suspect that he's lying. For those who haven't read it, Corey said that it struck him as strange looking back in retrospect that MJ as a 35yr old man would share such a thing with a child. I don't believe Corey was trying to insinuate that MJ was guilty, he was merely pointing out something that he couldn't explain. I hate hearing stuff like that, because it makes you question MJs motives. Recent interview? Is he now again on this BS and jumping on the bandwagon like he did in 2005?
Corey made that claim in 2005 while he held a grudge against MJ because he "left him to die" in New York on 9/11 or something. Unfortunately, then Corey saw it as payback time in 2005 by throwing in this little story as MJ was on trial fighting for his life, and I he also participated in Bashir's second shady documentary.
Context is everything and once again some important context is left out here.
The book was a book about venereal diseases that laid around somewhere in MJ's home, Corey found it and MJ explained it to him what it was. What is the questionable motive there? A book about venereal diseases is not sexy by any stretch of the imagination and there is no claim it was used in a sexual context or as "grooming" or anything.
Corey explains his 2005 shady moves in his book this lame way (he mentions the book story here too - acts clueless, like he didn't know what he was doing by throwing that in):
I am sorry if I am not too convinced by this. It is more the ego part that rings true here.
|
|
|
Post by MattyJam on Feb 6, 2019 20:19:03 GMT
As some of you know, I've been having some doubts lately. I took your advice and have stopped reading the tabloid articles and am just trying to read up a bit more about the actual facts of the past cases. The most recent thing that I found troubling though, was in a recent interview with Corey Feldman where he said that MJ showed him a graphic picture book depicting human genitalia as a child. I don't see why Corey would make this up, as Corey has always defended MJ and still does to this day, so I have no reason to suspect that he's lying. For those who haven't read it, Corey said that it struck him as strange looking back in retrospect that MJ as a 35yr old man would share such a thing with a child. I don't believe Corey was trying to insinuate that MJ was guilty, he was merely pointing out something that he couldn't explain. I hate hearing stuff like that, because it makes you question MJs motives. Recent interview? Is he now again on this BS and jumping on the bandwagon like he did in 2005?
Corey made that claim in 2005 while he held a grudge against MJ because he "left him to die" in New York on 9/11 or something. Unfortunately, then Corey saw it as payback time in 2005 by throwing in this little story as MJ was on trial fighting for his life, and I he also participated in Bashir's second shady documentary. Context is everything and once again some important context is left out here.
The book was a book about venereal diseases that laid around somewhere in MJ's home, Corey found it and MJ explained it to him what it was. What is the questionable motive there? A book about venereal diseases is not sexy by any stretch of the imagination and there is no claim it was used in a sexual context or as "grooming" or anything.
Corey explains his 2005 shady moves in his book this lame way (he mentions the book story here too - acts clueless, like he didn't know what he was doing by throwing that in): I am sorry if I am not too convinced by this. It is more the ego part that rings true here.
So Russ, in summary for you... Z-list celebrity spends the majority of his adult life using association with A++ list celebrity for publicity. When A++ list celebrity gets accused of a crime, Z-list celebrity uses the opportunity for some media exposure and free airtime. Classy.
|
|
|
Post by suzie on Feb 6, 2019 20:21:29 GMT
As some of you know, I've been having some doubts lately. I took your advice and have stopped reading the tabloid articles and am just trying to read up a bit more about the actual facts of the past cases. The most recent thing that I found troubling though, was in a recent interview with Corey Feldman where he said that MJ showed him a graphic picture book depicting human genitalia as a child. I don't see why Corey would make this up, as Corey has always defended MJ and still does to this day, so I have no reason to suspect that he's lying. For those who haven't read it, Corey said that it struck him as strange looking back in retrospect that MJ as a 35yr old man would share such a thing with a child. I don't believe Corey was trying to insinuate that MJ was guilty, he was merely pointing out something that he couldn't explain. I hate hearing stuff like that, because it makes you question MJs motives. From my understanding Cory didn’t meet MJ until he was pretty much an adult
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2019 20:21:52 GMT
Corey has his own issues, that will probably follow him to his grave. I dont see anything wrong in what he said recently, and what he said about the book seems to be just a weird situation arising from leaving a book lying around. Nothing more.
Id forget about Feldman, he has his own scores to settle. Hes not an enemy.
|
|
|
Post by suzie on Feb 6, 2019 20:23:59 GMT
Kinda OT: Now this RRHOF voter is claiming people didn’t want to vote for Janet because of MJs allegations youtu.be/LaqlX0N-sD4
|
|
|
Post by ilovehistory on Feb 6, 2019 20:32:19 GMT
|
|
|
Post by elusivemoonwalker on Feb 6, 2019 20:34:44 GMT
Forgot about corey and his mj left me to die in N.Y ramblings 😂 issues is his middle name
|
|