BBC apologizes for using fake bank statements to land famous
Nov 1, 2020 11:58:57 GMT
aazzaabb, barbee, and 1 more like this
Post by respect77 on Nov 1, 2020 11:58:57 GMT
I am putting this here, because this is where Mesereau was getting to during his examination of Bashir at the 2005 trial but was always blocked by Bashir's lawyer. Bashir also claimed it was "incorrect" that he was accused of forging signatures, which now turns out was a lie. So he perjured himself in 2005.
BBC apologizes for using fake bank statements to land famous Princess Diana interview
By Marisa Dellatto
October 31, 2020 | 5:51pm | Updated
The head of the BBC has apologized to the brother of Princess Diana for a journalist’s use of fake bank statements to lure her into the 1995 Panorama interview she gave after her split from Prince Charles.
Network director-general Tim Davie wrote to Diana’s brother, Charles Spencer, to acknowledge the fraudulent actions of reporter Martin Bashir 25 years ago.
Last month, the BBC finally admitted that Bashir showed Diana bank statements doctored by a staff graphic designer. Spencer had alleged that Bashir told his sister “fantastical stories to win her trust” and showed her fake bank records to land the interview, The Sunday Times of London reported.
At the time, the princess was deeply worried she was being spied on and that her staff was leaking information about her. Bashir’s “evidence” made her confident to do the interview, one year after she and Charles split.
“There were three of us in this marriage, so it was a bit crowded,” Diana said famously in the explosive interview, referring to Charles’ affair with Camila Parker Bowles. Weeks after the piece aired, the royals began divorce proceedings.
see also
BBC's Martin Bashir got Princess Diana tell-all by misleading her brother: report
A 1996 BBC internal investigation didn’t find any wrongdoing on the part of Bashir, who allegedly believed the bank statements came from a Freedom of Information request.
Sources told The Sunday Times that Spencer has a trove of records, including faxes Bashir allegedly sent to him and his sister about Charles, which say the British Intelligence Service wiretapped Diana’s phones. Bashir reportedly contacted Spencer with these wild claims to get through to Diana.
The BBC claims it can’t investigate further because of a lack of evidence and Bashir’s poor health — he’s battling COVID-19.
“If anyone has substantial new information they would like to share with us, we encourage them to do so – we have not been offered nor received a ‘dossier’ from anyone,” the corporation said.
By Marisa Dellatto
October 31, 2020 | 5:51pm | Updated
The head of the BBC has apologized to the brother of Princess Diana for a journalist’s use of fake bank statements to lure her into the 1995 Panorama interview she gave after her split from Prince Charles.
Network director-general Tim Davie wrote to Diana’s brother, Charles Spencer, to acknowledge the fraudulent actions of reporter Martin Bashir 25 years ago.
Last month, the BBC finally admitted that Bashir showed Diana bank statements doctored by a staff graphic designer. Spencer had alleged that Bashir told his sister “fantastical stories to win her trust” and showed her fake bank records to land the interview, The Sunday Times of London reported.
At the time, the princess was deeply worried she was being spied on and that her staff was leaking information about her. Bashir’s “evidence” made her confident to do the interview, one year after she and Charles split.
“There were three of us in this marriage, so it was a bit crowded,” Diana said famously in the explosive interview, referring to Charles’ affair with Camila Parker Bowles. Weeks after the piece aired, the royals began divorce proceedings.
see also
BBC's Martin Bashir got Princess Diana tell-all by misleading her brother: report
A 1996 BBC internal investigation didn’t find any wrongdoing on the part of Bashir, who allegedly believed the bank statements came from a Freedom of Information request.
Sources told The Sunday Times that Spencer has a trove of records, including faxes Bashir allegedly sent to him and his sister about Charles, which say the British Intelligence Service wiretapped Diana’s phones. Bashir reportedly contacted Spencer with these wild claims to get through to Diana.
The BBC claims it can’t investigate further because of a lack of evidence and Bashir’s poor health — he’s battling COVID-19.
“If anyone has substantial new information they would like to share with us, we encourage them to do so – we have not been offered nor received a ‘dossier’ from anyone,” the corporation said.
From MJ's 2005 trial:
10 Q. Mr. Bashir, you have been accused in England
11 of forging signatures, correct.
12 A. Incorrect.
13 Q. No one has ever made that accusation, sir.
14 MR. BOUTROUS: I’m going to object, Your
15 Honor. Hearsay; lack of foundation; beyond the
16 scope of direct examination.
17 THE COURT: Sustained on beyond the scope of
18 direct.
11 of forging signatures, correct.
12 A. Incorrect.
13 Q. No one has ever made that accusation, sir.
14 MR. BOUTROUS: I’m going to object, Your
15 Honor. Hearsay; lack of foundation; beyond the
16 scope of direct examination.
17 THE COURT: Sustained on beyond the scope of
18 direct.
6 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Mr. Bashir, if you look at
7 the two documents you referred to that you say Mr.
8 Jackson signed, his signature appears to be
9 different from document to document, correct.
10 MR. BOUTROUS: Same objection, Your Honor.
11 And -- same objection on the shield law, Your Honor;
12 and beyond the scope of direct.
13 THE COURT: Sustained; beyond the scope.
7 the two documents you referred to that you say Mr.
8 Jackson signed, his signature appears to be
9 different from document to document, correct.
10 MR. BOUTROUS: Same objection, Your Honor.
11 And -- same objection on the shield law, Your Honor;
12 and beyond the scope of direct.
13 THE COURT: Sustained; beyond the scope.
