|
Post by SmoothGangsta on May 25, 2022 13:18:24 GMT
The lawyer's arguments were ridiculous. It is however legal meandering and I won't be surprised if it somehow works.
|
|
|
Post by SoCav on May 25, 2022 13:51:05 GMT
This seems like an own goal by Sony. It does, but not having watched the hearing, it's hard to understand what point he is actually trying to make. Is there more context that can explain this apparent own goal? Or is it really just that?
|
|
|
Post by SmoothGangsta on May 25, 2022 14:58:36 GMT
This seems like an own goal by Sony. It does, but not having watched the hearing, it's hard to understand what point he is actually trying to make. Is there more context that can explain this apparent own goal? Or is it really just that? Honestly they didn't seem all that impressed with his answers, but siding with the big corporations is the norm so I won't be surprised if it goes that way.
|
|
|
Post by NatureCriminal7896 on May 26, 2022 22:36:38 GMT
even it been 12 years since the album been released. i still feel that they should be removed. some fans may say it's been 12 years. who cares? i'm one of those fans that feel they should be removed. they not Michael.
|
|
|
Post by NatureCriminal7896 on May 26, 2022 22:54:07 GMT
even if the case doesn't win. they still not Michael and needs to be remove. i hope it wins.
|
|
|
Post by rhinoskin on May 26, 2022 22:57:38 GMT
It does, but not having watched the hearing, it's hard to understand what point he is actually trying to make. Is there more context that can explain this apparent own goal? Or is it really just that? Honestly they didn't seem all that impressed with his answers, but siding with the big corporations is the norm so I won't be surprised if it goes that way. Unfortunately this is the truth. A sad truth...
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Aug 11, 2022 3:17:15 GMT
|
|
|
Post by SmoothGangsta on Aug 12, 2022 18:31:22 GMT
Wonder when we're gonna hear about this
|
|