|
Post by Russg on Mar 10, 2019 23:44:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by MattyJam on Mar 11, 2019 0:02:07 GMT
I despair! It seems you can just publish anything these days, true or not it doesn’t matter. Where does the child pornography myth stem from? Radar Online? This kind of stuff needs to be shut down, as people will read it and think it’s true. I have tried to alert this to Taj on Twitter.
|
|
|
Post by Vega on Mar 11, 2019 0:18:50 GMT
I despair! It seems you can just publish anything these days, true or not it doesn’t matter. Where does the child pornography myth stem from? Radar Online? This kind of stuff needs to be shut down, as people will read it and think it’s true. I have tried to alert this to Taj on Twitter. Yeah, it stems from that Radar Online report from a few years back which acted like the police report from the raid in 2005 was some leaked document never seen before. Of course, the entire fucking media picked it up as they love to do with tabloid shit about Michael Jackson, even though all the "kiddie porn" was just art books you can buy on Amazon.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Mar 11, 2019 5:44:40 GMT
Child porn is a federal crime. If such shit had ever been found in MJ's home he would have been charged with it. Simple. Even Zonen denied the child porn claim in 2016. “There were all kinds of conventional porn magazines,” says Zonen. “Things like Playboy, Penthouse. There was one called Barely Legal. It was a publication that featured young women presumably over the age of 18 but selected because they look much younger.” Law enforcement also discovered a book of “masochistic” type drawings. When it comes to items relating to children, “There were photos of nude children but they weren’t sexually graphic,” he says. “They weren’t children engaged in sexual activity and there was no child pornography. There were no videos involving children. There were videos that were seized but they were conventional adult sexually graphic material. No children involved.” people.com/crime/michael-jacksons-estate-blasts-new-pornography-reports/But for the life of me I will never understand why fans torture themselves with reading tabloid articles.
|
|
|
Post by HIStoric on Mar 11, 2019 6:02:41 GMT
Child porn is a federal crime. If such shit had ever been found in MJ's home he would have been charged with it. Simple. Cue the morons who claim that money makes him powerful and can buy his way out of this shit.
Funnily enough, if you really could do tha,t he wouldn't be in this situation in the first place!
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Mar 11, 2019 8:28:39 GMT
Yeah, Sneddon and Zonen clearly were so protective of MJ.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2019 7:10:18 GMT
We have a shitty tabloid show on TV here called "Daily Mail TV" despite the British tabloid name, it looks American and its has been Michael Jackson and R Kelly crap all week. They are now pushing the "ring" story as proof of a bizarre homosexual marriage to Jimmy Safechuck.
Complete crap, that ring was a present as Jimmy liked Bling. People often buy each other friendship rings anyway, it takes tabloid maggots to link it to sex. Some people need to get their mind out of the gutter. On Wednesday a story about "2 new boys come forward" disappeared the next day with no info about either accuser. I think they see LN fading and they have to make up some crap to keep it relevant.
|
|
|
Post by Russg on Mar 19, 2019 12:38:27 GMT
Anyone know who this guy is? He claims to have worked with MJ, but I've never heard of him. Did he direct a video? I've copied and pasted the article so you don't have to click on the link. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6825479/Music-video-director-worked-Michael-Jackson-believes-abuse-claims.html#commentsMusic video director who worked with Michael Jackson says he believes 'almost every word' of sex abuse allegations against the singer - and insists the King of Pop only has himself to blame if his legacy is in ruins
Rudi Dolezal said he believed 'almost every word' of Leaving Neverland's claims
He said he understood why the accusers earlier denied being abused by Jackson
Wade Robson and James Safechuck both allege the King of Pop molested them A music video director who worked with Michael Jackson has revealed he believes the two men who accuse the King of Pop of abusing them as children. Rudi Dolezal said he believed 'almost every word' of what Wade Robson and James Safechuck alleged in the documentary Leaving Neverland. Austrian producer Dolezal said he understood why the two accusers had changed their testimony, having previously said Jackson did not abuse them. 'If the Michael Jackson legend is destroyed by this, the person responsible is Michael Jackson - no one else.' Describing Jackson's treatment by his father, Dolezal said the singer had been forced to dance on a hot stovetop at the age of four to force him to move quickly. Dolezal was also the director of Freddie Mercury's last music video, These Are The Days of Our Lives, and is writing a book about the Queen frontman. Speaking to Page Six, he said Jackson alone was responsible if his reputation was 'destroyed' by the new allegations.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Mar 19, 2019 12:50:54 GMT
Never heard of him. Usual tabloid bullcrap.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Mar 19, 2019 12:56:11 GMT
From LSA:
"Apparently he was an external staff member for a German TV channel that broadcasted a Dangerous concert.
So basically, a complete fucking nobody."
|
|
|
Post by MattyJam on Mar 19, 2019 13:40:32 GMT
From LSA: "Apparently he was an external staff member for a German TV channel that broadcasted a Dangerous concert. So basically, a complete fucking nobody." My God, how desperate are they for articles about MJ now? Quick, stop the press - this random dude who never met MJ and directed a video for a completely unrelated band 25yrs ago thinks MJ is guilty! What a scoop! There'll literally make a story out of thin air these days.
|
|
|
Post by MichaelD on Mar 19, 2019 19:56:10 GMT
Dolezal is from Austria and he was somewhat connected to the MJ & Friends Munich 1999 broadcast (not Dangerous tour), external producer or whatever, some technical stuff, I can't exactly recall. But yeah, completely irrelevant what he's saying, as he didn't even know Michael Jackson.
There's this documentary he released many years ago (after MJ's death):
|
|
|
Post by Liberian Girl on Mar 21, 2019 12:00:34 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2019 5:45:54 GMT
The story is definitely fading now, the sad and sick terrorist attack in Christchurch virtually obliterated it from the media overnight here. Sounds like they are getting more and more desparate.
Soon it will be "My old dog once met one of MJ's dogs and they exchanged telepathy from watching kids being abused by MJ, and now my dog relives the trauma of the memory" - Daily Mail and radaronline exclusive SCOOP!
This director reminds me of the German guy who sued him in the early 2000s (Michael something) for some unmade or unsponsored documentary. It seems suing Michael Jackson was the fad of the era.
|
|
|
Post by SmoothGangsta on Apr 9, 2019 11:21:58 GMT
|
|