|
Post by danm on Jan 30, 2019 10:45:00 GMT
A video will no doubt appear later but this is a quick summary of Jermaine on Good Morning Britain. Emotional, as expected. Started brilliantly with saying that Wade testified in MJ's favour in 2005. Jermaine even read bits of the the testimony. He then said Wade tried to get a book deal and failed. Jermaine then mentioned the Cirque Du Soleil show and how Wade wanted to get the choreography gig and didn't. Then unfortunately it went down hill from there. I believe Piers Morgan mentioned the settlements at this stage and Jermaine said he'd (meaning Jordan) said it never happened and the Father killed himself out of guilt. *Sigh* With the mention of the settlements Jermaine had little defence. He said an advisor told MJ to settle. He mentioned Joy helping him with his book he wrote. Jermaine then ended by simply saying they've lost MJ and their Father and to leave them alone. He reiterated let MJ rest. He never mentioned Safechuck. The End. Pleading to let MJ rest will not work. You cannot plead to let the man rest as it simply will not work. Certainly not in the current climate. Overall, it wasn't good enough to me. He needed facts regarding the lawsuits and didn't have any. Better than nothing I suppose, at least there is some defence for MJ there. It still baffles me that 26 years later, not one person defending MJ on TV that I've come across has adequately explained the '93 settlement. Even T Mez, who we all respect hugely, didn't explain it properly back in 04/05. he used to say that MJ was given bad advice and settled when he shouldn't have - true to an extent, but the best explanation is that he settled the civil suit so as not to prejudice and weaken his defenc ein a criminal trial. There was no silencing of Jordy Chandler. Why can't anyone explain it the way us fans would? Edit: regarding facts from the lawsuit, that's where the Estate needs to come in. They have the facts, they were involved in the litigation. John Brance/Estate lawyers, where are you? Piers Morgan has interviewed Branca before when he had his show in the US. Get him on.
|
|
|
Post by ilovehistory on Jan 30, 2019 11:36:02 GMT
Better than nothing I suppose, at least there is some defence for MJ there. It still baffles me that 26 years later, not one person defending MJ on TV that I've come across has adequately explained the '93 settlement. Even T Mez, who we all respect hugely, didn't explain it properly back in 04/05. he used to say that MJ was given bad advice and settled when he shouldn't have - true to an extent, but the best explanation is that he settled the civil suit so as not to prejudice and weaken his defenc ein a criminal trial. There was no silencing of Jordy Chandler. Why can't anyone explain it the way us fans would? Edit: regarding facts from the lawsuit, that's where the Estate needs to come in. They have the facts, they were involved in the litigation. John Brance/Estate lawyers, where are you? Piers Morgan has interviewed Branca before when he had his show in the US. Get him on. I think the settlement is private, legally nobody can talk about it, and only known facts are a part of the trial. Maybe only Jordan could clarify the settlement or the background, Jordys lawyers Feldman is still alive, afaik, as we as Rothman, so they have their say into this issue aka they would do anything to block any public info about that
|
|
|
Post by SmoothGangsta on Jan 30, 2019 11:45:42 GMT
The fact that the people with the biggest voices seem to be idiots who just believe this crap makes me despair.
|
|
|
Post by danm on Jan 30, 2019 11:47:41 GMT
So according to the tweet above, a medallion that Safechuck apparently shows in the documentary as part of a mock wedding ceremony he had with MJ was actually given to Wade, according to VG’s fictional book. If anyone has access to this vile book can they check page 135?
|
|
|
Post by MattyJam on Jan 30, 2019 11:59:39 GMT
the people with the biggest voices seem to be idiots. Isn’t that always the way in life?
|
|
|
Post by pg13 on Jan 30, 2019 14:03:58 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2019 14:40:04 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ilovehistory on Jan 30, 2019 14:40:26 GMT
Did you consciously post a pedo blog about Reeds pedo hunter movie on page 39 of this thread?
|
|
|
Post by pg13 on Jan 30, 2019 14:59:53 GMT
Did you consciously post a pedo blog about Reeds pedo hunter movie on page 39 of this thread? Is it? I usually check things out properly and didn't really do that for that one. Will look again at it later. Christ, so it appears to be. Eek....nind you, its dirt on Dan Reed and Stinson Hunter I'm looking for.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Jan 30, 2019 15:32:36 GMT
Jane Doe? LOL. But probably just made it up. This guy is as much of a liar as Wade and James are. Like he perpetuates the lie that Wade and James haven't talked to each other and had no way of aligning their stories. Yet, Wade himself admitted in his deposition that they have talked.
|
|
|
Post by Cloudbuster on Jan 30, 2019 15:33:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Snow White on Jan 30, 2019 15:42:08 GMT
That lie about the insurance company or the lawyers forcing him to settle needs to die, it baffles me the fans haven't bother to read the court papers in regards to the settlement and regurgitate a lie Brian Oxman said. The lawyers advised him to settle because his defense team lost all 4 motions to have the criminal proceedings ahead of the civil ones. The defense strategy would have been revealed in the civil trial and the prosecution would have fixed the weaknesses their case had.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2019 15:45:58 GMT
Jane Doe? LOL. But probably just made it up. This guy is as much of a liar as Wade and James are. Like he perpetuates the lie that Wade and James haven't talked to each other and had no way of aligning their stories. Yet, Wade himself admitted in his deposition that they have talked. Francia maybe?
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Jan 30, 2019 15:46:54 GMT
What a great, eloquently written blog post!
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Jan 30, 2019 15:48:21 GMT
Jane Doe? LOL. But probably just made it up. This guy is as much of a liar as Wade and James are. Like he perpetuates the lie that Wade and James haven't talked to each other and had no way of aligning their stories. Yet, Wade himself admitted in his deposition that they have talked. Francia maybe? Could be, but my guess is Jane Doe. I think Reed started making this shit in February 2017. Jane Doe was still on board then. She got out in May 2017.
|
|