respect77
The Legend Continues
Posts: 10,580
Member is Online
|
Post by respect77 on Oct 14, 2019 9:46:10 GMT
There's a difference because a different part of the law would apply. But it still would be against the companies, not the Estate. The Estate did not even exist then.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 14, 2019 9:52:42 GMT
There's a difference because a different part of the law would apply. But it still would be against the companies, not the Estate. The Estate did not even exist then. Ah. Loads to prove there that's fiction then. Interesting to see what happens. No doubt a "victory for all CSA survivors" photo by the pool to be shared.
|
|
|
Post by elusivemoonwalker on Oct 14, 2019 10:49:58 GMT
Thanks. Does this give them a better chance of wining though are they still facing the same problems interms of the companies been owned by mj etc
|
|
|
Post by suzie on Oct 14, 2019 11:30:41 GMT
So as expected the new bill has been passed. It looks like Wade and James will be able to refile their case. They’re over 40 and it’s past 5 years so I’m Not sure how this helps them.
|
|
|
Post by Snow White on Oct 14, 2019 11:45:12 GMT
Robson is 38 but I'm not sure if it's going to take into account Safechuck's lawsuit which was done before that scumbag was 40. #MeToo is a cancer already.
|
|
|
Post by HIStoric on Oct 14, 2019 12:17:40 GMT
So as expected the new bill has been passed. It looks like Wade and James will be able to refile their case. They’re over 40 and it’s past 5 years so I’m Not sure how this helps them. The article states that for the next 3 years, beginning January 1, all statutes of limitations are off the table so anyone of any age can bring forth lawsuits. So if they get within that period, it won’t matter - I think.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 14, 2019 12:20:35 GMT
"And if victims can prove entities tried to cover up the abuse, the court can multiply the damages by three."
It's all so so predictable. Those 2 guys think they have it all sorted!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 14, 2019 12:30:02 GMT
They still have to prove the companies are liable. They have a lot of obstacles.
|
|
|
Post by suzie on Oct 14, 2019 12:40:54 GMT
They’re over 40 and it’s past 5 years so I’m Not sure how this helps them. The article states that for the next 3 years, beginning January 1, all statutes of limitations are off the table so anyone of any age can bring forth lawsuits. So if they get within that period, it won’t matter - I think. But while Wade isn’t 40, he discovered his abuse more than 5 years ago. So idk.
|
|
|
Post by suzie on Oct 14, 2019 12:41:12 GMT
They still have to prove the companies are liable. They have a lot of obstacles. The same obstacle they had before
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 14, 2019 12:43:04 GMT
They still have to prove the companies are liable. They have a lot of obstacles. The same obstacle they had before 'Zactly. This just wipes the slate clean for the exact same process. Theyll hope for a settlement
|
|
|
Post by SmoothGangsta on Oct 14, 2019 12:45:16 GMT
If they're hoping for a settlement then they may as well give up now lol.
|
|
|
Post by HIStoric on Oct 14, 2019 12:52:48 GMT
The article states that for the next 3 years, beginning January 1, all statutes of limitations are off the table so anyone of any age can bring forth lawsuits. So if they get within that period, it won’t matter - I think. But while Wade isn’t 40, he discovered his abuse more than 5 years ago. So idk. I think the 3 year suspension for statutes of limitations applies to both the age of victim and when they realised their abuse. I imagine most people over 40 who have been abused would’ve come to realize it well over 5 years ago, so to make the suspension effective they’d have to apply it to both conditions of the statutes of limitations. At least that’s how I’m interpreting it, but like you I don’t know for certain.
|
|
|
Post by elusivemoonwalker on Oct 14, 2019 13:28:31 GMT
So its just another five plus years of waiting going through the same process.i dont see how you should be able to refile a case thats already going through the courts. Statue didnt stop them filing against the companies so why should they be able to refile again. This should only be for ppl who couldnt file before because of the previous laws.
|
|
|
Post by Thriller on Oct 14, 2019 13:35:28 GMT
A few days late I know, but about that discussion on Prince.org... The claim that Brett testified to having slept in MJ's bed for 400 plus nights isn't true. His sister estimated she and her brother were on tour with MJ for about a year. This then led to the question of if MJ and Brett slept in the same bed for 365 days. She said yes. Haters run with this as proof of something. Given its sensational they don't bother researching it. It's also of course worth noting that Brett says nothing happened. Haters know he is a massive issue in the narrative. He spent far more time with MJ than Wade, yet says nothing happened. The same goes for mentions of the Cascios and Omer Bhatti. They spent more time with MJ but say nothing happened. These, and others, put a huge dent in Wade's claims.
Anywho, back to the original point. MJ didn't sleep alone with Brett on his Dangerous Tour for 365 days. The tour dates show this. The first leg (European) was from June-October 1st. There was then the small second leg Toyko which Karlee didn't testify to having been there with her brother. Then came the third and final leg in which the Cascios were also with Brett and MJ.
Therefore 365 days of MJ sleeping alone with Brett is impossible.
However, even if he had, Brett says nothing ever happened. Haters want MJ to have abused him and Brett to come forward as it'd help their narrative and to get the victim count up.
Also, the mention of MJ not allowing girls around. How convenient that they ignore Jane Doe. They don't want to acknowledge how she throws a massive spanner into the works.
|
|