|
Post by Thriller on Feb 11, 2020 23:08:22 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Thriller on Feb 11, 2020 23:22:48 GMT
The audacity of James Franco to want to mention LN.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Feb 12, 2020 11:15:09 GMT
Of course some will say "just because he wasn't molested it doesn't mean Wade/James weren't either". While technically that's true, they are also missing the point. Mac (and Brett) aren't just some random kids about whom you can say the fact they weren't molested is irrelevant here. There's a reason why they were specifically mentioned in LN. Wade/James know the fact they weren't molested is a problem for them, so they need to suggest they are in some kind of denial. Wade said in an interview "I don't think Michael kept any kid around for any other reason than to molest them". They know that it would look odd for a supposed serial molester to molest them, but not others who MJ spent a lot more time with. Joy Robson specifically complains about Mac in both LN and her deposition that MJ wanted to rather spend time with him than her son. She also complains MJ took Brett on tour with him instead of Wade. Why would a pedophile want to rather hang with the kids he does not molest than the kid he supposedly does? Plus this also shows for the millionth time that MJ's interest in kids was not sexual.
There's another ridiculous excuse I see by haters that MJ didn't molest Mac because he was famous. Ugh, Wade got famous too. And MJ gave him the opportunity to come to the US and get famous. And Brett wasn't famous and he says the same as Mac.
It's just lame how sick some people in the head are when they sound legit disappointed that Mac doesn't accuse MJ.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Feb 12, 2020 11:22:46 GMT
Oh and yes, James Franco has some nerve to salivate over LN, considering the allegations against him. He (together with his buddy, Judd Apatow) better mind their own business.
|
|
TonyR
The Legend Continues
Posts: 8,486
|
Post by TonyR on Feb 12, 2020 12:21:38 GMT
Trials and Tribulations section?
Was enjoying just coming here and talking about the music again.
|
|
|
Post by Snow White on Feb 12, 2020 18:55:27 GMT
This part absolutely broke my heart, I don't think Macaulay ever talked how was the last time they saw each other before LN. The only good thing about this is that it completely shattered Robson's and Safechuck's stupid claim Michael ever couched anyone to testify on his behalf.
|
|
|
Post by MattyJam on Feb 12, 2020 19:22:39 GMT
This part absolutely broke my heart, I don't think Macaulay ever talked how was the last time they saw each other before LN. The only good thing about this is that it completely shattered Robson's and Safechuck's stupid claim Michael ever couched anyone to testify on his behalf. Not really. I mean, haters will just say MJ coached Wade because he was abused and didn't feel the need to do that with Mac because he wasn't.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Feb 12, 2020 20:23:56 GMT
This part absolutely broke my heart, I don't think Macaulay ever talked how was the last time they saw each other before LN. The only good thing about this is that it completely shattered Robson's and Safechuck's stupid claim Michael ever couched anyone to testify on his behalf. Not really. I mean, haters will just say MJ coached Wade because he was abused and didn't feel the need to do that with Mac because he wasn't. Why do they think they spent so much time in LN to suggest Mac was a victim?
Or why do they think Wade said in an interview he didn't think MJ had any boys around for any other reason than to molest them?
Because they know Mac and Brett not being molested weakens their position. Especially when you know, from Joy Robson's own 2016 depo, no less, that MJ actually preferred hanging out with both Mac and Brett.
Mind you, before Black or White they lived in Australia. So when was Wade exactly this big favorite of MJ?
Both Mac and Brett spent a lot more time with MJ than Wade. This is a problem for them. If MJ was this serial pedophile and his interest in children was sexual it hardly makes any sense for him to rather hang out with the boys he doesn't molest than the one he does. This is why Mac and Brett are a problem for them and why they need to suggest they were victims, only they are in denial. And if they are going to suggest (and they absolutely do) that Mac and Brett are victims in denial, then of course, the fact that MJ didn't coach Mac like he supposedly did Wade matters as something that goes against their story.
|
|
|
Post by MattyJam on Feb 12, 2020 20:40:42 GMT
respect77 Well, Wade/James are much like the Arvizo's, in that they threw everything at the wall in the hope that something would stick, and in doing so, ended up weakening their case rather than strengthening it. I stand by my assertion that MJ's comments to Mac can't be used as proof that Wade lied about the coaching story. We've all heard the hater rhetoric that MJ didn't molest Mac/Feldman etc because they were too high profile etc and therefore a risk. And at the end of the day, I don't believe a pedophile molests every child they come into contact with. It may even be possible for a pedophile to have a close, platonic interest in a child, because it's about sexual attraction, and I think it's a misnomer that a pedophile can't be in the company of a child without resisting the urge to offend. The whole argument that MJ wasn't accused by Brett, Mac, Corey and the Casico's, therefore Wade, James, Jordan and Gavin must be lying is flawed. Of course, it goes against Wade's ridiculous opinion that MJ was only interested in being around children so he could molest them, but I think fans should focus on the reasons why we believe Wade and James's cases are bogus, and not using the kids who haven't accused him to undermine those who have.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Feb 12, 2020 20:44:34 GMT
respect77 Well, Wade/James are much like the Arvizo's, in that they threw everything at the wall in the hope that something would stick, and in doing so, ended up weakening their case rather than strengthening it. I stand by my assertion that MJ's comments to Mac can't be used as proof that Wade lied about the coaching story. We've all heard the hater rhetoric that MJ didn't molest Mac/Feldman etc because they were too high profile etc and therefore a risk. And at the end of the day, I don't believe a pedophile molests every child they come into contact with. It may even be possible for a pedophile to have a close, platonic interest in a child, because it's about sexual attraction, and I think it's a misnomer that a pedophile can't be in the company of a child without resisting the urge to offend. The whole argument that MJ wasn't accused by Brett, Mac, Corey and the Casico's, therefore Wade, James, Jordan and Gavin must be lying is flawed. Of course, it goes against Wade's ridiculous opinion that MJ was only interested in being around children so he could molest them, but I think fans should focus on the reasons why we believe Wade and James's cases are bogus, and not using the kids who haven't accused him to undermine those who have. Fans focus on a lot of things, this is not their only argument and not even their main argument, so it is a bit unfair to act like it is or like fans can't make valid arguments. But IMO it is very wrong to say it doesn't matter considering the specifics of Wade's own allegations. They can use Mac and Wade to portray MJ as a serial molester but we can't counter them by pointing out Mac and Brett don't accuse, but defend MJ? C'mon now!
And if your focus is on what haters say, I am telling you a LOT of their websites is a bunch of speculation about how MJ molested each and every boy that was around him. They use Mac and Brett as well for that. So of course, it does matter to hammer it down that most of the kids they speculate about being victims don't claim to be victims.
|
|
|
Post by MattyJam on Feb 12, 2020 20:54:05 GMT
respect77 Well, Wade/James are much like the Arvizo's, in that they threw everything at the wall in the hope that something would stick, and in doing so, ended up weakening their case rather than strengthening it. I stand by my assertion that MJ's comments to Mac can't be used as proof that Wade lied about the coaching story. We've all heard the hater rhetoric that MJ didn't molest Mac/Feldman etc because they were too high profile etc and therefore a risk. And at the end of the day, I don't believe a pedophile molests every child they come into contact with. It may even be possible for a pedophile to have a close, platonic interest in a child, because it's about sexual attraction, and I think it's a misnomer that a pedophile can't be in the company of a child without resisting the urge to offend. The whole argument that MJ wasn't accused by Brett, Mac, Corey and the Casico's, therefore Wade, James, Jordan and Gavin must be lying is flawed. Of course, it goes against Wade's ridiculous opinion that MJ was only interested in being around children so he could molest them, but I think fans should focus on the reasons why we believe Wade and James's cases are bogus, and not using the kids who haven't accused him to undermine those who have. Fans focus on a lot of things, this is not their only argument and not even their main argument, so it is a bit unfair to act like it is or like fans can't make valid arguments. But IMO it is very wrong to say it doesn't matter considering the specifics of Wade's own allegations. They can use Mac and Wade to portray MJ as a serial molester but we can't counter them by pointing out Mac and Brett don't accuse, but defend MJ? C'mon now! My point is, it's a weak argument and shouldn't be used at all. Haters using Mac and Brett to bolster their argument just goes to show how weak their case is. It is exactly why the prosecution fell flat on their face in 2005, as they were trying to use non-victims to strengthen their own problematic accuser and it came back to bite them on the ass. If MJ was truly guilty, they wouldn't need to clutch at straws by trying to force victimhood on people who insist they were never abused. Fans don't need to stoop to that same level, because we have enough legit proof that Wade and James are full of shit.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Feb 12, 2020 20:58:30 GMT
Fans focus on a lot of things, this is not their only argument and not even their main argument, so it is a bit unfair to act like it is or like fans can't make valid arguments. But IMO it is very wrong to say it doesn't matter considering the specifics of Wade's own allegations. They can use Mac and Wade to portray MJ as a serial molester but we can't counter them by pointing out Mac and Brett don't accuse, but defend MJ? C'mon now! My point is, it's a weak argument and shouldn't be used at all. Haters using Mac and Brett to bolster their argument just goes to show how weak their case is. It is exactly why the prosecution fell flat on their face in 2005, as they were trying to use non-victims to strengthen their own problematic accuser and it came back to bite them on the ass. If MJ was truly guilty, they wouldn't need to clutch at straws by trying to force victimhood on people who insist they were never abused. Fans don't need to stoop to that same level, because we have enough legit proof that Wade and James are full of shit. It's not stooping to any level, Matty. It is directly refuting arguments that THEY make (yes, including Wade and James, with the whole "replacement" crap). It's an important part of their narrative that MJ moved on to other boys to molest when he got bored of Wade and James. And Mac and Brett are specifically mentioned as such boys.
So Mez shouldn't have addressed it either when the prosecution claimed Mac and Brett etc were victims? Guess what, they did address that! They didn't just say "we are not stooping to that level, we are so above that".
FYI, Mac's interview actually reached big publicity. Today they talked about the biggest celebrity TV show here and it was an absolutely positive report. A year ago this same show was all over LN. I saw another positive report about it on a website. So yes, these things matter. More than you think IMO.
|
|
|
Post by MattyJam on Feb 12, 2020 21:08:14 GMT
My point is, it's a weak argument and shouldn't be used at all. Haters using Mac and Brett to bolster their argument just goes to show how weak their case is. It is exactly why the prosecution fell flat on their face in 2005, as they were trying to use non-victims to strengthen their own problematic accuser and it came back to bite them on the ass. If MJ was truly guilty, they wouldn't need to clutch at straws by trying to force victimhood on people who insist they were never abused. Fans don't need to stoop to that same level, because we have enough legit proof that Wade and James are full of shit. It's not stooping to any level, Matty. It is directly refuting arguments that THEY make (yes, including Wade and James, with the whole "replacement" crap). So Mez shouldn't have addressed it either when the prosecution claimed Mac and Brett etc were victims? Guess what, they did address that! They didn't just say "we are not stooping to that level, we are so above that".
FYI, Mac's interview actually reached big publicity. Today they talked about the biggest celebrity TV show here and it was an absolutely positive report. A year ago this same show was all over LN. I saw another positive report about it on a website. So yes, these things matter. More than you think IMO.
Of course fans should counter any ridiculous arguments that Mac/Brett were victims, but I don't think they can be used as credible proof that Wade/James weren't. Just because Wade/James claim they were replaced by Mac/Brett, that doesn't disprove anything with regards to their actual allegations.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Feb 12, 2020 21:17:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Feb 12, 2020 21:19:26 GMT
It's not stooping to any level, Matty. It is directly refuting arguments that THEY make (yes, including Wade and James, with the whole "replacement" crap). So Mez shouldn't have addressed it either when the prosecution claimed Mac and Brett etc were victims? Guess what, they did address that! They didn't just say "we are not stooping to that level, we are so above that".
FYI, Mac's interview actually reached big publicity. Today they talked about the biggest celebrity TV show here and it was an absolutely positive report. A year ago this same show was all over LN. I saw another positive report about it on a website. So yes, these things matter. More than you think IMO.
Of course fans should counter any ridiculous arguments that Mac/Brett were victims, but I don't think they can be used as credible proof that Wade/James weren't. Just because Wade/James claim they were replaced by Mac/Brett, that doesn't disprove anything with regards to their actual allegations. No one said it single handedly disproves their allegations, but every detail is important and these details add up and are not used and sole arguments. I am not sure why it is difficult to see how these arguments aren't standalone arguments but are a part of a complex. If they are going to play the serial pedophile-replacement card, then it absolutely needs to be addressed.
|
|