|
Post by Cloudbuster on Dec 4, 2020 15:29:44 GMT
This claim of the CDC admitting Covid doesn't exist is yet another misrepresentation of what was actually written and what it means: www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-cdc-idUSKBN27633RSometimes it's good to check what scientists say rather than what some random YouTuber reads into text that he doesn't understand. YouTube? This is what was in the document July 2019. Bottom of page 39 (PDF Page 40), 2nd paragraph. "The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019- nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen." But as you can see it's no longer there. www.fda.gov/media/134922/downloadSo why the revisionism. It just gets more curious.
|
|
|
Post by Cloudbuster on Dec 4, 2020 15:35:03 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2020 15:45:15 GMT
Just had a read of his post about the environment there as it caught my eye (quiet Friday). What a cunt. Irrelevant to what's being discussed, but Jesus.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Dec 4, 2020 16:13:35 GMT
This claim of the CDC admitting Covid doesn't exist is yet another misrepresentation of what was actually written and what it means: www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-cdc-idUSKBN27633RSometimes it's good to check what scientists say rather than what some random YouTuber reads into text that he doesn't understand. YouTube? This is what was in the document July 2019. Bottom of page 39 (PDF Page 40), 2nd paragraph. "The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019- nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen." But as you can see it's no longer there. www.fda.gov/media/134922/downloadSo why the revisionism. It just gets more curious. The article I linked explains what it means. What makes you think some random YouTuber is more qualified to interpret that paragraph than a scientist? Maybe they removed that part because, as the scientist quoted in the article stated, it's no longer the case (as opposed to when the original paper was written)? “There are now hundreds of stocks of cultured SARS-CoV-2 in laboratories around the world”, he said."
|
|
|
Post by Cloudbuster on Dec 4, 2020 21:58:18 GMT
The article I linked explains what it means. What makes you think some random YouTuber is more qualified to interpret that paragraph than a scientist? Maybe they removed that part because, as the scientist quoted in the article stated, it's no longer the case (as opposed to when the original paper was written)? “There are now hundreds of stocks of cultured SARS-CoV-2 in laboratories around the world”, he said." The CDC removed that part post-July. So why didn't they have the evidence before when the world went into lockdown due to the alleged virus? And why has no FOI request resulted in evidence for the claims being made that there is a deadly virus? Take the vaccine, wear your mask, keep your distance, do as your told, don't ask for evidence, trust the government.
|
|
TonyR
The Legend Continues
Posts: 8,413
|
Post by TonyR on Dec 4, 2020 22:23:23 GMT
The article I linked explains what it means. What makes you think some random YouTuber is more qualified to interpret that paragraph than a scientist? Maybe they removed that part because, as the scientist quoted in the article stated, it's no longer the case (as opposed to when the original paper was written)? “There are now hundreds of stocks of cultured SARS-CoV-2 in laboratories around the world”, he said." The CDC removed that part post-July. So why didn't they have the evidence before when the world went into lockdown due to the alleged virus? And why has no FOI request resulted in evidence for the claims being made that there is a deadly virus? Take the vaccine, wear your mask, keep your distance, do as your told, don't ask for evidence, trust the government. Serious question, how can the virus be fake when a million plus have died from it? And if the virus was created to kill us them why is the vaccine also created to kill us. And what does Bill Gates gain by killing us all?
|
|
|
Post by Cloudbuster on Dec 4, 2020 22:31:06 GMT
Strange how doctors wouldn't see me for months but they're now willing to see me as soon as possible to stick a needle in me. I'll say that I refuse to do face-to-face appointments due to the virus and that they'll have to vaccinate me over the phone.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2020 22:41:02 GMT
Strange how doctors wouldn't see me for months but they're now willing to see me as soon as possible to stick a needle in me. I'll say that I refuse to do face-to-face appointments due to the virus and that they'll have to vaccinate me over the phone. You need to find new doctors. I assumed doctors had just stopped taking walk-in appointments and all had to be arranged over the phone?
|
|
|
Post by Cloudbuster on Dec 4, 2020 22:41:31 GMT
Serious question, how can the virus be fake when a million plus have died from it? And if the virus was created to kill us them why is the vaccine also created to kill us. And what does Bill Gates gain by killing us all? Bill Eugenicist Gates will make millions. Probably billions. Where have I said the virus was created? Where have I said that the vaccine was created to kill you? What I have mentioned is the depopulation goals of the Globablists and the possibility that it could be done through vaccination. A million people have died from it? Are you aware about hospitals being paid to falsify death certificates? Do you believe everything the mainstream media tell you? MJ was a paedo, right? The virus hasn't been proven to exist. Every answer to your questions is in the other thread.
|
|
|
Post by Cloudbuster on Dec 4, 2020 22:44:13 GMT
You're free to take your vaccinations for a virus that hasn't been proven to exist. Take care y'all. Later.
|
|
TonyR
The Legend Continues
Posts: 8,413
|
Post by TonyR on Dec 4, 2020 23:51:22 GMT
You're free to take your vaccinations for a virus that hasn't been proven to exist. Take care y'all. Later. Well, if you're right you won't see us later.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Dec 5, 2020 4:32:36 GMT
Serious question, how can the virus be fake when a million plus have died from it? And if the virus was created to kill us them why is the vaccine also created to kill us. And what does Bill Gates gain by killing us all? Bill Eugenicist Gates will make millions. Probably billions. Where have I said the virus was created? Where have I said that the vaccine was created to kill you? What I have mentioned is the depopulation goals of the Globablists and the possibility that it could be done through vaccination. A million people have died from it? Are you aware about hospitals being paid to falsify death certificates? Do you believe everything the mainstream media tell you? MJ was a paedo, right? The virus hasn't been proven to exist. Every answer to your questions is in the other thread. I don't believe everything the mainstream media tells me however I believe first hand experiences in hospitals. Here in my town there are three hospitals. First they appointed one hospital to treat Covid patients. Then they had to clear another one for treating Covid patients as well. Now the third one also has to treat them. One of those hospitals is an exclusively Covid hospital now. Here it's not in the interest of the government to exaggerate Covid numbers, on the contrary it would be their interest to downplay them, since during the second wave they refused to go into lockdown so it would be great for them to report things aren't that bad. Unfortunately they can't report that. Things really are bad in the hospitals. And once again: if depopulation is the goal all they had to do was to NOT vaccinate anyone any more for anything. Anti-vax conspiracy theorists would be happy, I guess. And THAT would be a way to reduce population if that was the goal. ETA: And I can tell you first hand that here hospitals don't falsify death certificates. My grandfather died this november. Before his death he was taken to the Covid hospital. As it turned out they took him there to test because his roommate in the other hospital tested positive for Covid-19 and my grandfather had to be tested as well according to protocol. He died a few days later in the Covid hospital, but not of Covid. His test was negative. And no one falsified his documents. His documents don't claim he died of Covid-19 because didn't. If there was some worldwide conspiracy to falsify documents his case would have been easy to claim for Covid-19 because his underlying issue that he died of also produces a lot of similar symptoms (like coughing, shortness of breath). He eventually died of pneumonia like a lot of Covid-19 patients. But his was not Covid related and no one ever tried to falsify documents that it was. Another thing is that here the number of deaths are 40 percent higher this autumn period than it was last year. I'm sure nothing to do with the non existent virus and non existent pandemic.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Dec 5, 2020 4:37:02 GMT
The article I linked explains what it means. What makes you think some random YouTuber is more qualified to interpret that paragraph than a scientist? Maybe they removed that part because, as the scientist quoted in the article stated, it's no longer the case (as opposed to when the original paper was written)? “There are now hundreds of stocks of cultured SARS-CoV-2 in laboratories around the world”, he said." The CDC removed that part post-July. So why didn't they have the evidence before when the world went into lockdown due to the alleged virus? And why has no FOI request resulted in evidence for the claims being made that there is a deadly virus? Take the vaccine, wear your mask, keep your distance, do as your told, don't ask for evidence, trust the government. I can tell you didn't even read the article I linked. No that paragraph isn't about that there's no evidence the virus exists. You rely on the interpretation of conspiracy theorists about what it means. But a scientist in the article explains what it means.
|
|
TonyR
The Legend Continues
Posts: 8,413
|
Post by TonyR on Dec 8, 2020 14:32:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by elusivemoonwalker on Dec 8, 2020 16:36:35 GMT
It will be covid what? By the time the vaccine gets to me. So dont know or care to much at this point.
|
|