|
|
Post by SmoothGangsta on Jan 13, 2024 10:00:04 GMT
Yesterday morning when I Google searched MJ and hit the news filter it showed pretty much every UK tabloid media carrying a thumbnail with MJ and Epstein. I’m not saying the fans are always right in how they proceed, but let’s be honest here also, the fans have been responsible for keeping MJ’s legacy alive. It was, after all, the fans who dismantled Leaving Neverland by picking apart all of the inconsistencies and also sharing court documents and transcripts with a lot of the general public. The media always use MJ as a scapegoat. Let’s not always use the fans as a scapegoat for the medias behaviour. Sure, fans don’t always need to draw attention to every single little thing, but at the same time, fans don’t need to cower away and hide from the facts either. I personally don't think it's coincidental that I'm having to currently defend MJ on another forum. To be fair, they're making rubbish arguments but throwing a lot of mud to see if it will stick! I'm just picking them off slowly. But letting them rant first. I read some of the threads on there and it just seems to be a bunch of people who read tabloid rumours and believed them. Or watched LN and (somehow) thought they were telling the truth. I've never been able to understand how some can have literally no knowledge on something and still act like they are an authority. A lot of "I reckon" going on over there. |
|
|
|
Post by pg13 on Jan 13, 2024 13:44:45 GMT
I personally don't think it's coincidental that I'm having to currently defend MJ on another forum. To be fair, they're making rubbish arguments but throwing a lot of mud to see if it will stick! I'm just picking them off slowly. But letting them rant first. I read some of the threads on there and it just seems to be a bunch of people who read tabloid rumours and believed them. Or watched LN and (somehow) thought they were telling the truth. I've never been able to understand how some can have literally no knowledge on something and still act like they are an authority. A lot of "I reckon" going on over there. You're absolutely spot on. That's exactly what it was! I think those who kept on making personal attacks have been at least temp banned. Thread is gone too.  |
|
|
|
Post by aazzaabb on Jan 14, 2024 13:22:19 GMT
Yesterday morning when I Google searched MJ and hit the news filter it showed pretty much every UK tabloid media carrying a thumbnail with MJ and Epstein. I’m not saying the fans are always right in how they proceed, but let’s be honest here also, the fans have been responsible for keeping MJ’s legacy alive. It was, after all, the fans who dismantled Leaving Neverland by picking apart all of the inconsistencies and also sharing court documents and transcripts with a lot of the general public. The media always use MJ as a scapegoat. Let’s not always use the fans as a scapegoat for the medias behaviour. Sure, fans don’t always need to draw attention to every single little thing, but at the same time, fans don’t need to cower away and hide from the facts either. I personally don't think it's coincidental that I'm having to currently defend MJ on another forum. To be fair, they're making rubbish arguments but throwing a lot of mud to see if it will stick! I'm just picking them off slowly. But letting them rant first. Yeah I agree. I don’t think the fans are at fault either in this instance. Why aren’t the media using thumbnails with Oprah’s face or any of the other names mentioned? It’s another excuse to open the Jackson pot whilst deflecting from others involved. And it’s given haters the green light to spout their uneducated nonsense. |
|
|
|
Post by WildStyle on Jan 14, 2024 13:58:41 GMT
The list with Oprah included is fake. Not sure why MJ fans are falling for that other than they just want it to be true.
|
|
|
|
Post by aazzaabb on Jan 14, 2024 14:16:36 GMT
The list with Oprah included is fake. Not sure why MJ fans are falling for that other than they just want it to be true. I didn’t know that. I don’t care either way if it’s true. Sort of like MJ haters wanting MJ’s association to be true. Because it’s actually no more relevant than the fact Oprah being included is fake. But I’m pretty sure there’s other relevant names that could be included. |
|
|
|
Post by amaya on Jan 14, 2024 17:43:12 GMT
The list with Oprah included is fake. Not sure why MJ fans are falling for that other than they just want it to be true. It's just a bad look for us fans. I keep seeing stuff pop up on Instagram recommendations that mention her being on the list. The only positive that can come from this is to teach the hater crowd a lesson about fake sources and biased reporting. You know, a taste of their own medicine. ...but the fans that blindly repeat "Oprah on the list!" aren't gonna do that with that intent, are they? -_- |
|
ontime
Wondering Who
Posts: 100
|
Post by ontime on Jan 17, 2024 18:23:55 GMT
The Epstein “list” (flight log to pedo Island) has never been revealed. Anyone salivating over a fake “list” is an idiot. I don’t think the real “list” will ever come out.
|
|
|
|
Post by NatureCriminal7896 on May 30, 2024 13:18:07 GMT
Oprah Winfrey, an influential and (respected) figure around the world, has been associated with controversial and morally questionable individuals such as John of God and Harvey Weinstein.
João de Deus, has faced a series of shocking allegations of sexual abuse by hundreds of women in Brazil and abroad. However, while society clamored for justice and accountability, Oprah chose not to take a clear stance on the issue.
As an influential voice and advocate for women's rights, her lack of action in the face of such disturbing allegations is disappointing and, for many, inexplicable.
The friendship between Harvey Weinstein and Oprah Winfrey is still a relationship that generates controversy and questions about ethical and moral standards in the entertainment industry. Weinstein, a powerful film producer, and Winfrey, an influential TV host and businesswoman, were associated for years, sharing a connection that extended beyond professional boundaries.
While Weinstein faced intense scrutiny for his disgusting actions of rape and sexual harassment, Oprah diverted her focus to publicly accusing Michael Jackson, relying on baseless lies.
It's alarming how willing Oprah was to cover up the disgusting conduct of her friends in the name of her friendship and personal convenience. Not only did she ignore Harvey Weinstein's actions behind the scenes in Hollywood, but she also gave voice to Jackson's dubious accusers.
Yes, Oprah Winfrey funded the eye-catching documentary "Leaving Neverland." Totally condemned by the public for fabricated lies, the presenter supported this film and put herself at the center of a storm of controversy, dividing opinions around the world.
All in an effort to divert attention from the real issues and protect your network from compromising relationships...
Imagine a presenter you admire, who you respect, partying on a private island owned by an infamous man, Jeffrey Epstein, known for his heinous crimes. Yes, it's hard to believe, but it's true. Oprah Winfrey was a constant presence at these parties, in an environment rife with suspicion and scandal.
As a self-proclaimed Christian public figure and advocate for justice, Oprah should reflect on her associations and choices. By allying herself with morally questionable individuals and attempting to manipulate the truth to protect her own image, she is straying from the values she supposedly stands for and risking being seen as complicit in the evils she claims to fight...
|
|
