|
Post by ghost on Jan 4, 2024 10:50:20 GMT
smh
Media are loving splashing his face across this story. So frustrating.
|
|
|
Post by aazzaabb on Jan 4, 2024 11:19:18 GMT
The media agenda to wipe the world of MJ is just astonishing. Apparently because MJ’s name was mentioned in one line in reference to an advisor he used. It makes you feel a little hopeless when you realise the media just do not want a person to succeed in life. And of course we’ve got Leaving Neverland II to look forward to which will probably drop a week before the Biopic release. It’s a strange world we live in.
|
|
|
Post by aazzaabb on Jan 4, 2024 11:36:38 GMT
Okay, I’ve just had a look on X and anything MJ seems to be in support of him and saying how all the people who accused him are on the Epstein List? Perhaps it’s finally judgment day, or is this just the usual rather large bubble that is X/Twitter?
|
|
|
Post by ghost on Jan 4, 2024 11:56:36 GMT
Okay, I’ve just had a look on X and anything MJ seems to be in support of him and saying how all the people who accused him are on the Epstein List? Perhaps it’s finally judgment day, or is this just the usual rather large bubble that is X/Twitter? Gavin Arvizo and Wade Robson were on the island?
|
|
|
Post by aazzaabb on Jan 4, 2024 12:00:08 GMT
Okay, I’ve just had a look on X and anything MJ seems to be in support of him and saying how all the people who accused him are on the Epstein List? Perhaps it’s finally judgment day, or is this just the usual rather large bubble that is X/Twitter? Gavin Arvizo and Wade Robson were on the island? No, Oprah and her ilk.
|
|
|
Post by MattyJam on Jan 4, 2024 12:00:53 GMT
I always felt like this whole Twitter mentality of "look at this celebrity who once had his photo taken stood next to so and so predator" was beyond moronic. So what? Is it a crime now to have met or God forbid be in a photo next to a person who's committed a crime? It ain't fucking Covid-19. You can't catch criminality from being in the same room as them.
|
|
|
Post by aazzaabb on Jan 4, 2024 12:14:43 GMT
I always felt like this whole Twitter mentality of "look at this celebrity who once had his photo taken stood next so and so predator" was beyond moronic. So what? Is it a crime now to have met or God forbid be in a photo next to a person who's committed a crime? It ain't fucking Covid-19. You can't catch criminality from being in the same room as them. It is the continuation of this dumbed down world we’re living in. The same media outlets who use a picture of MJ looking ridiculous in a courtroom for some entirely unrelated case 20 years ago or his ridiculous mugshot next to the headline “ Jackson Named In Epstein Files” are the same people who sold tribute editions of him when he passed. It is beyond moronic but what it does do is nudge those who have bought into these frivolous articles for decades another notch on the misinformed opinion that MJ was indeed some sort of deranged lunatic monster. Ironic that MJ is constantly being accused of living in cuckoo land by an industry that makes its living from living in cuckoo land.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2024 12:54:11 GMT
Read a few things about this earlier. First I'm seeing about MJs name. MJ fans doing the devils work again.
|
|
|
Post by aazzaabb on Jan 4, 2024 13:08:37 GMT
Read a few things about this earlier. First I'm seeing about MJs name. MJ fans doing the devils work again. If you Google Michael Jackson and hit the -news- button all of the major tabloids are carrying it.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Jan 4, 2024 16:46:57 GMT
I always felt like this whole Twitter mentality of "look at this celebrity who once had his photo taken stood next to so and so predator" was beyond moronic. So what? Is it a crime now to have met or God forbid be in a photo next to a person who's committed a crime? It ain't fucking Covid-19. You can't catch criminality from being in the same room as them. I feel the social media age has brought down the average IQ of humankind by at least 20 points. MJ is mentioned in one line and the woman clearly says nothing untoward happened. Nothing to see here.
I said this about other celebrities as well. Just because they met Epstein, and if there's no other allegation regarding them, then their names shouldn't be dragged into this. People act like all Epstein did all day, everyday, was prostituting underage women to celebrity clients and that's the only reason why people would talk to him. No. He actually had a proper job, he was a financial advisor, which is how and why most celebrities met him.
There are some celebrities/famous people about whom there are more serious allegations in these files. The media should focus on them, not the ones with the biggest names.
Actually these are the things people should pay attention to in these files, not thirsting for juicy celebrity stories.
Here's Sky News' mention of MJ. At least this time they are being fair:
|
|
|
Post by Snow White on Jan 4, 2024 18:16:25 GMT
Are people that imbecilic for real? If so, schools should take away their degrees from them. 🤦♀️ Just because Michael sought after financial advice from Epstein ONE TIME, it doesn't mean he was involved in illegal activities regarding underage girls. Same with other famous people that weren't implied in sex crimes.
|
|
ontime
Wondering Who
Posts: 100
|
Post by ontime on Jan 4, 2024 19:25:40 GMT
|
|
TonyR
The Legend Continues
Posts: 8,486
|
Post by TonyR on Jan 4, 2024 20:42:34 GMT
Yep, as with most MJ 'scandals', it's only MJ fans talking about it.
|
|
|
Post by aazzaabb on Jan 4, 2024 20:48:59 GMT
Those gawd damned MJ fans up to their antics again! Damn you MJ fans! Damn you and your penchant for fancy footwork and white sparkly gloves!!
|
|
|
Post by amaya on Jan 4, 2024 23:52:40 GMT
Yep, as with most MJ 'scandals', it's only MJ fans talking about it. Some folks on Reddit are taking it as "proof/not surprised", but from what I'm seeing such comments are not being upvoted much.
|
|