|
Post by respect77 on Sept 27, 2020 5:54:35 GMT
This is Critical Race Theory (CRT) for you, that Ibrahim Kendi is a prominent representative of. He wrote the book called "How to Be An Anti-Racist" which is, along with Robin Di Angelo's "White Fragility", is considered the Bible of anti-racism and CRT. They are the books used as literature at US companies in CRT trainings. Be aware that when they say "anti-racist", that's Orwellian double speak, because CRT is racist as fuck. You can criticize Donald Trump for many things, but defunding CRT trainings at federal organizations was a good move by him. CRT is racist madness. It's just the left's racism, so it is considered OK and is even promoted by mainstream media.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Sept 27, 2020 6:14:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Sept 27, 2020 9:16:32 GMT
|
|
|
Post by pg13 on Sept 28, 2020 7:23:08 GMT
JK Rowling has received a lot of support in a public letter.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Sept 29, 2020 14:57:28 GMT
The woke mob now came for Richard Dawkins. Note how they cite his criticism of Islam as a reason but not his criticism of Christianity. When he probably did the latter a lot more. Certain ideologies are OK to criticize, others are not. Equals and more equals.
|
|
|
Post by pg13 on Sept 29, 2020 15:57:52 GMT
The woke mob now came for Richard Dawkins. Note how they cite his criticism of Islam as a reason but not his criticism of Christianity. When he probably did the latter a lot more. Certain ideologies are OK to criticize, others are not. Equals and more equals. This is in the Republic of Ireland where they apparently have no real problem with a PIRA controlled Sinn Féin. But they have a problem with Richard Dawkins over his views on Islam and sexual assault? Give me a break! Hell will freeze over before they stop voting for SF which also has a history of covering up sexual abuses and before TCD boot SF society out of their campus. Ridiculous virtue signalling nonsense. Dawkins is infinitely more welcome and palatable than SF!
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Sept 29, 2020 16:29:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by SmoothGangsta on Sept 29, 2020 16:31:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Sept 29, 2020 16:47:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Sept 29, 2020 17:25:56 GMT
It's very long, and I have just took a glance of it for now, but I read the part on Rapid Onset Dysporia and I already have some problems with this. I find the use of "conversion therapy" by trans activists in this context VERY deceptive. What we understand by conversion therapy traditionally is when a gay kid is put through all kind of (often harmful) psychiatric or physical treatment to try to turn him straight. But what does that mean in the trans context? In that context it means, for example, NOT letting your child transition while they are underage - just telling them "give it some time" or a doctor telling them "you might have other psychological issues, you are not really trans" could qualify as "conversion therapy". I think it is a fundamentally different thing than gay conversion therapy, especially because transitioning (be it medical treatment - hormones -, or surgery) have long term health effects as this doctor will tell you.
So IMO it is only understandable from a parent if they don't want their children to rush this decision and not allow their kids medically transition while they are underage. That's not the same as gay conversion therapy at all, but trans activists use this term deliberately for the emotional effect because in many people's mind it is associated with the horrible torture of gay kids (eg. being electrocuted etc) and they want to act like a parent not allowing their underage child medically transition or a doctor being skeptical of a kid's or teen's claim that they are trans and suspecting other issues instead is the same thing. They are actually lobbying for laws when parents' rights to not allow their children medically transition will be taken away under this claim that prohibiting your child to transition is "conversion therapy". This is an especially dangerous path because it IS a thing that teens feel they are trans and later it turns out they aren't really, they have been just influenced by some online community, friend, media, other psychological issues etc.
Here are some first hand accounts by those who went through that.
Many trans activists are very dishonest in not acknowledging or downplaying this phenomenon.
Debunked right here by the BBC (or in the first interview with the doctor above):
Where did Rowling argue for the banning of gender confirmation surgery altogether? I don't think most people raising concern about the aggressive nature of trans activism and some of the directions it is going deny the existence of real trans people and the benefit of medical transitioning for those people. JK Rownling included.
And because the phenomenon that all those ex-trans people talk about in the above videos is also real. That part shouldn't be swept under the rug either.
Except, there is no scientific consensus. But there is a strong, politically and ideologically supported trans lobby that mutes any critical voice in the medical community. The doctor in the first video touches on that as well.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Sept 29, 2020 19:22:51 GMT
This also shows how fragile the science really is on this topic still, yet kids are being referred to hormones and gender reassignment surgery like there's no tomorrow. And if you raise a concern about it you are a transphobe or a TERF.
Read the article linked in this tweet.
|
|
|
Post by pg13 on Sept 30, 2020 8:46:24 GMT
She's cherry picking and being selective. For example, she argues that TERF isn't an insult and isn't used as a bullying tactic. Except it routinely is exactly that. A councillor in Dundee was found to have used it as hate speech: www.thecourier.co.uk/fp/news/local/dundee/892784/watchdog-finds-dundee-councillor-breached-code-of-conduct-with-offensive-tweets/This councillor is not alone in doing this. The writer never acknowledges this and tries deflection instead with the "you call everything transphobic these days" aspect. Yet hypersensitivity is increasingly a problem these days, often primarily pushed in the social media sphere. There is also real, genuine concern about the police overstepping the law in relation to investigating non-crime hate incidents. See here: www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-lincolnshire-51501202Clearly, the police no longer deal with actual crime incidents and this is going to cause further conflicts with the tenets of freedom of speech/expression into the future. The writer of the JKR piece also doesn't acknowledge this.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Sept 30, 2020 9:21:59 GMT
LMAO
|
|
|
Post by pg13 on Sept 30, 2020 10:13:43 GMT
The writer (and her team of researchers!) also misrepresented JKR's argument here: That's a strawman argument since JKR didn't argue that GRCs is necessary in order to gain entry to female only toilets. She merely stated that one can get a GRC without surgery or hormones which is correct. This is under the Standard Route section. But the article's author seems to be suggesting there hasn't been a problem in the UK with allowing transgender individuals access to female only toilets here: Except it has happened. Here's one from Scotland: www.scotsman.com/regions/edinburgh-fife-and-lothians/female-spaces-need-better-protection-after-trans-woman-sex-assault-girl-say-campaigners-140883Easy, slap on the wrist let off for this assault. Point is, many women already perceive sexual assault risks in general. But it's not outside the realm of possibility that a transgender individual could more easily sexually assault a female in a space as confined as a toilet.
|
|
|
Post by pg13 on Sept 30, 2020 10:22:05 GMT
|
|