TonyR
The Legend Continues
Posts: 8,486
|
Post by TonyR on Dec 13, 2018 16:01:17 GMT
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Dec 13, 2018 17:06:20 GMT
I know her fans have been campaigning for it for many years, so well done!
|
|
|
Post by aazzaabb on Dec 14, 2018 19:50:03 GMT
Is it true that JT is presenting her with the award and induction? PSYCH! 😭
|
|
|
Post by Snow White on Dec 14, 2018 20:26:09 GMT
Her brothers should induct her but is she really rock and roll? This is coming from someone who doesn't understand the Jackson 5 induction, at least MJ has more rock songs and worked with famous rock musicians.
|
|
|
Post by aazzaabb on Dec 14, 2018 20:40:13 GMT
Her brothers should induct her but is she really rock and roll? This is coming from someone who doesn't understand the Jackson 5 induction, at least MJ has more rock songs and worked with famous rock musicians. Black Cat was pretty rock & roll but no she’s definitely pop. Without wanting to put a downer on Janet’s achievement, the older I’m getting the more I wonder if this type of accolade actually means anything? I’ve become somewhat cynical about the whole awards thing recently. I suppose it’s nice to be recognised for what you do.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Dec 15, 2018 4:44:16 GMT
Her brothers should induct her but is she really rock and roll? This is coming from someone who doesn't understand the Jackson 5 induction, at least MJ has more rock songs and worked with famous rock musicians. It's not only rock acts in the Hall of Fame. Is Madonna rock and roll? Hall and Oates? Sam Cooke? James Brown? NWA? It's popular music, not just rock.
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Dec 15, 2018 4:46:20 GMT
Her brothers should induct her but is she really rock and roll? This is coming from someone who doesn't understand the Jackson 5 induction, at least MJ has more rock songs and worked with famous rock musicians. Black Cat was pretty rock & roll but no she’s definitely pop. Without wanting to put a downer on Janet’s achievement, the older I’m getting the more I wonder if this type of accolade actually means anything? I’ve become somewhat cynical about the whole awards thing recently. I suppose it’s nice to be recognised for what you do. I was wondering if they will eventually run out of worthy artists. I mean every year 5 artists are inducted. But real legends and icons aren't really made at that rate.
|
|
|
Post by Snow White on Dec 15, 2018 5:26:09 GMT
Her brothers should induct her but is she really rock and roll? This is coming from someone who doesn't understand the Jackson 5 induction, at least MJ has more rock songs and worked with famous rock musicians. It's not only rock acts in the Hall of Fame. Is Madonna rock and roll? Hall and Oates? Sam Cooke? James Brown? NWA? It's popular music, not just rock. It shouldn't be called the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame if they induct musicians who are part of others genres and have nothing to do with rock and roll. Janet's fans act she's been snubbed for years but Nina Simone was eligible ever since the Hall was founded but she was inducted this year, talk about long overdue and snobbery.
|
|
|
Post by aazzaabb on Dec 16, 2018 2:16:40 GMT
Black Cat was pretty rock & roll but no she’s definitely pop. Without wanting to put a downer on Janet’s achievement, the older I’m getting the more I wonder if this type of accolade actually means anything? I’ve become somewhat cynical about the whole awards thing recently. I suppose it’s nice to be recognised for what you do. I was wondering if they will eventually run out of worthy artists. I mean every year 5 artists are inducted. But real legends and icons aren't really made at that rate. Absolutely. It’s so strange how some -average- artists are inducted yet some genuine -legends- are ignored or have to be campaigned for, for years.
|
|
|
Post by suzie on Dec 17, 2018 4:58:51 GMT
It's not only rock acts in the Hall of Fame. Is Madonna rock and roll? Hall and Oates? Sam Cooke? James Brown? NWA? It's popular music, not just rock. It shouldn't be called the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame if they induct musicians who are part of others genres and have nothing to do with rock and roll. Janet's fans act she's been snubbed for years but Nina Simone was eligible ever since the Hall was founded but she was inducted this year, talk about long overdue and snobbery. Rock and roll isn’t just about a genre of music. It just means non classic. It’s never been about one specific genre
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2020 10:25:01 GMT
I don't know what to make of the perception of Janet. Her music is absolutely killer (well, for the most part of her career. Her sales have decreased much like anyone else in her age category so that's no biggie.) Control, Rhythm Nation, Janet., Velvet Rope. How can these NOT be considered some of the greatest pop/RNB albums of all time? EVen if she called it a day at that, what a career and what a path she created. Started in the shadow of her brother(s) and then became her own animal. I was jumping from album to album last night and her stuff is just incredible.
The Superbowl killed her. Dead. It was a stupid stunt that reeked of attention seeking, but the reaction she got was absolutely 2020 level stupid. On top of that, I think Glastonbury last year damaged her too over here and in the UK. It was the wrong setting for lip synching, the shortened set was not festival friendly and it was just not what people were looking for at a 2019 festival. It was also less than 3 months after the MJ shit, which people would have associated with her and her name too< i'm sure. Then, she goes to Montreux a few weeks later, does her full set and blows away the audience. I read that she arrived on late, which is considered VERY disrespectful at the Montreux Jazz Festival, but she still turned it around and I didnt see ONE complaint about her tardiness after the show (just a couple while they were waiting for her to start). It's a shame this wasnt more widely broadcast.
Don't care anyway, she's one of the best. Control to Rope are absolute masterclasses in leadership. So completely removed from MJ's stuff. I threw on a show from the Rhythm Nation Tour last night on YT and it was pretty cool.
I know she got in the HOF this year, but I hope the next few years are kinder to Janet. That being said, her silence on the shit last year doesn't sit 100% right with me either. I know she was riding a wave with an upcoming tour, but nothing on this planet would keep me from defending my sister's to my grave. Then again, the Jacksons have not exactly been the most normal family, have they?
|
|
|
Post by respect77 on Jun 14, 2020 7:17:42 GMT
To me it is so weird that that stupid Superbowl fiasco could just end her career like that. MJ went through lot more damaging stuff, like decades long of character assassination that's still going on now, yet he still remains one of the most renowned artists. While Janet is almost completely forgotten. I feel Janet's fan base must have been a lot more fickle and less loyal. I'm of two minds when it comes to her. One is that she definitely would deserve more credit than she gets from the mainstream media. She is one of the major blue prints female performers mould themselves after. Especially the singer-dancer types, obviously. If Madonna is credited with being a blue print for the likes of Gaga, Janet too should be given credit for being the blue print for the likes of Beyoncé. So on the one hand I feel she would deserve more credit. On the other hand it is so off-putting to me that I see some of the biggest hostility to MJ from her fans. I don't know what it is, probably the frustration that she doesn't get enough credit, but why take it out on Michael of all people? Thing with her music is that while I think it should get more credit, but to me personally it never really klicked. I did try to get into her, esp. in the 90s when I felt it was a "duty" to also like MJ's sister if you like him. I had the Janet album for that reason, but I can't say I was crazy for it. I think many MJ fans felt that way at the time, but here in Europe her music never really klicked the way it did in the USA, IMO. Her "fans" here were more those MJ fans who felt that duty to support her too. I think one reason why she never really klicked could be that she is just not a great singer. Her voice is weak and that perhaps puts her at a disadvantage. As for dance, IMO she is the greatest female dancing pop star. Hands down. Beyoncé, Britney, Madonna etc. couldn't even touch her when it comes to dancing. Her catalog is better than given credit for IMO, but it has limited appeal compared to MJ's. I don't know I just don't enjoy her catalog enough to call me a fan. Just this week I listened to Rhythm Nation again and while it is a good album, it doesn't get to the "special" status to me. What I mean is, it is a well-crafted album, but emotionally it doesn't do anything to me (which is important to me). And I have the same feeling about all of her other albums as well. It is like when I listen to it "OK, it is cool, it is good", but it doesn't make me want to listen to it again and again. Yeah, maybe it is the emotional element that's missing to me from Janet, as well-crafted as her albums are. I think Janet's catalog is actually stronger than Whitney Houston's, but Whitney put such an emotion in her performances that her songs had wider appeal for that reason and remained more memorable.
|
|
|
Post by MattyJam on Jun 14, 2020 7:39:33 GMT
To me it is so weird that that stupid Superbowl fiasco could just end her career like that. MJ went through lot more damaging stuff, like decades long of character assassination that's still going on now, yet he still remains one of the most renowned artists. While Janet is almost completely forgotten. I feel Janet's fan base must have been a lot more fickle and less loyal. I'm of two minds when it comes to her. One is that she definitely would deserve more credit than she gets from the mainstream media. She is one of the major blue prints female performers mould themselves after. Especially the singer-dancer types, obviously. If Madonna is credited with being a blue print for the likes of Gaga, Janet too should be given credit for being the blue print for the likes of Beyoncé. So on the one hand I feel she would deserve more credit. On the other hand it is so off-putting to me that I see some of the biggest hostility to MJ from her fans. I don't know what it is, probably the frustration that she doesn't get enough credit, but why take it out on Michael of all people? Thing with her music is that while I think it should get more credit, but to me personally it never really klicked. I did try to get into her, esp. in the 90s when I felt it was a "duty" to also like MJ's sister if you like him. I had the Janet album for that reason, but I can't say I was crazy for it. I think many MJ fans felt that way at the time, but here in Europe her music never really klicked the way it did in the USA, IMO. Her "fans" here were more those MJ fans who felt that duty to support her too. I think one reason why she never really klicked could be that she is just not a great singer. Her voice is weak and that perhaps puts her at a disadvantage. As for dance, IMO she is the greatest female dancing pop star. Hands down. Beyoncé, Britney, Madonna etc. couldn't even touch her when it comes to dancing. Her catalog is better than given credit for IMO, but it has limited appeal compared to MJ's. I don't know I just don't enjoy her catalog enough to call me a fan. Just this week I listened to Rhythm Nation again and while it is a good album, it doesn't get to the "special" status to me. What I mean is, it is a well-crafted album, but emotionally it doesn't do anything to me (which is important to me). And I have the same feeling about all of her other albums as well. It is like when I listen to it "OK, it is cool, it is good", but it doesn't make me want to listen to it again and again.
Yeah, I think her voice suits her music, but also limits her appeal. There's only one fully live performance I can think of in her entire career, I think she performed I Get Lonely live on some US TV show back in the day. Her concerts are all 100% pre-recorded vocals and always have been. Even the HIStory tour had way more live vocals than any Janet concert ever had. I'm not getting at her for it, but other average vocalists like Madonna or Kylie Minogue at least try and sing live on most of their shows. Janet really was a blueprint for someone like Britney tbh, all dancing, no singing etc. I think her catalogue, particularly her first four albums, is strong, but definitely not strong enough to seriously compete alongside Madonna and not even in the same league as geniuses like Prince and MJ. Another thing which I think detracts from her is that she was very much an artist of her producers (Jam & Lewis). It's no coincidence that her commercial appeal took a serious nosedive around the same time she started working with other producers. MJ had success before Quincy and achieved huge success, both commercially and especially artistically post-Quincy. He wrote enough songs by himself to prove that he alone was a major factor in why people brought Michael Jackson records. Even Madonna, who has seldom written a song by herself and always works with outside producers, has proven that she is a massive factor in her own appeal. She has found massive success with a huge array of co-collaborators and producers, which proves that she has some kind of "x" factor of her own. Janet's career was in doldrums before her first album with Jam & Lewis and went back the doldrums when she branched away from them.
|
|
TonyR
The Legend Continues
Posts: 8,486
|
Post by TonyR on Jun 14, 2020 12:28:58 GMT
Been through this before but one of the reasons why Janet faded is the lack of great material after 1997.
She would have recovered after the Superbowl if she was releasing anything with the quality of 86 to 97. But it was mostly bad.
Michael recovered as HIStory was so amazing so people still mostly bought into it.
Don't forget most people outside the US didn't give a crap about the Superbowl yet Janet still didn't sell. That's because she didn't release anything of interest. I tried to follow her career as long as I could but every album after TVR just got worse and worse. And I don't mean Invincible worse, (as in not a patch on her best but still very good), I mean unlistenable worse.
But at her height, Rhythm Nation and Janet, she was amazing.
Music era wise 1992-1994 with singles from Dangerous, janet and Erotica all riding the charts was one of my favourite eras ever in music.
|
|
|
Post by Vega on Jun 14, 2020 13:52:03 GMT
I think Janet's fade over the years has more to do with her style of music not wearing well over time. She's in the same position as Karyn White or Bobby Brown in that way. New Jack Swing just hasn't aged well and that entire period in black music isn't talked about much these days.
I do know that she gets a lot of promotion these days as a legacy artist, and I can't think of anyone who still cares about the Superbowl incident and most people are on her side.... they're just not playing Nasty or Rhythm Nation.
|
|